<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.10" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drupal and the enterprise</title>
	<link>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Ken Rickard's notes about what he's doing</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.10</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Second Goose &#187; Enterprise Drupal</title>
		<link>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-22441</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-22441</guid>
					<description>[...] His post merges nicely with some things I&#8217;m doing right now (and reminded me of this old post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] His post merges nicely with some things I&#8217;m doing right now (and reminded me of this old post). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Second Goose &#187; Tech Notes</title>
		<link>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-840</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-840</guid>
					<description>[...] Back in my post on Drupal and the enterprise, written right after OSCMS in Vancouver, I made some points about why we developed in 4.6 instead of the then-beta 4.7. I still think those observations are true, particularly the &#8220;we don&#8217;t have the resources to help get 4.7 out, so we shouldn&#8217;t tinker with it.&#8221; But that point is infinitely debatable. It comes down to personal (and business) comfort. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Back in my post on Drupal and the enterprise, written right after OSCMS in Vancouver, I made some points about why we developed in 4.6 instead of the then-beta 4.7. I still think those observations are true, particularly the &#8220;we don&#8217;t have the resources to help get 4.7 out, so we shouldn&#8217;t tinker with it.&#8221; But that point is infinitely debatable. It comes down to personal (and business) comfort. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken Rickard</title>
		<link>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>Yeah, but we're too far down a development path to pull up and try to hit 4.7 as a target.  Better to launch in 4.6 and port up when we get some breathing room.

I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but we&#8217;re too far down a development path to pull up and try to hit 4.7 as a target.  Better to launch in 4.6 and port up when we get some breathing room.</p>
<p>I hope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Boris Mann</title>
		<link>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ken.therickards.com/2006/02/26/drupal-and-the-enterprise/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Beta is a state of mind :P

Thanks for adding to the discussion, Ken. I think you'll find that working in 4.7 will solve more problems than it creates, and the longer you linger on an older codebase (especially developing custom code around it, which is much easier to separate cleanly in 4.7), the harder time you will have keeping up, hence the advice to move now before folks get nice and settled in an (old) environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beta is a state of mind :P</p>
<p>Thanks for adding to the discussion, Ken. I think you&#8217;ll find that working in 4.7 will solve more problems than it creates, and the longer you linger on an older codebase (especially developing custom code around it, which is much easier to separate cleanly in 4.7), the harder time you will have keeping up, hence the advice to move now before folks get nice and settled in an (old) environment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
